The first scanned quadrant had significantly smaller error, -17 ± 26.3 μm, than the second quadrant, -116 ± 103 μm.ĭigital impressions with CEREC Bluecam system can be a feasible alternative for challenging cases where angulation and depth of the implants are present. The position of the camera affected the accuracy of the system. Angulation and implant depth did not affect the accuracy results. Operator 3 (inexperienced) performed better than the rest. The experience of the operator affected the accuracy. Measurements with coordinated measuring machine of the master model acted as the true values. Experienced (n = 2) and inexperienced (n = 2) operators performed the scanning (CEREC system). 15 with 30° distal angulation in relation to the vertical plane (y axis). 25 was placed with 30° mesial angulation and no. To evaluate the accuracy of a digital impression system considering clinical parameters.Ī master model with 6 implants (27, 25, 22, 12, 15, and 17) was fitted with polyether ether ketone scan bodies.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |